Saturday 14 November 2020

ARLIS/ANZ 2020 Conference Morning Session 2

The second morning session began with Michael Phillips speaking about the Role of the Autographic and Materiality in Prints. I found it interesting that an artist would choose to deliver a 'lo-fi' experience online with his art, in counterpoint to our HD world. In a similar vein, Monte Masi in South Australia has played around with Zoom to create a piece that explores and exaggerates common Zoom tropes and frustrations. Phillips sees the post in post-digital as an expansion rather than a return to pre-digital.

I was particularly interested in Caren Florance's presentation - as part of her research, she found that the increasing reliance on the web to record information renders it vulnerable to link-rot and content drift. This is of particular concern to historians as it makes it increasingly difficult to record the history of various groups. Florance, who titled her paper Augmented Materiality, Lost Reality, was focused on the history of printmaking and artists' books. She demonstrated the difficulty by looking at some websites, including the Libris Awards for artists' books, and Petr Herel and the Graphic Investigation Workshop. The Libris Awards, hosted by Artspace Mackay, was managed online this year and the judges found it impossible to judge the books without touching them. She notes that there has been no update to Catalano's review of Australian artists' books in 1983 and doubts that it is even possible now. Instead, she notes that is necessary to write smaller books whose histories are more locally focused and that it needs be done now or it never will be .

Paul Uhlmann discussed his art practice in Artists’ Books: Objects of Visible and Invisible Realms. He quoted Merleau-Ponty: Where are we to put the limit between the body and world, since the world is flesh? Taking inspiration from the German Romantics, he photographs the sky, particularly at dawn and twilight, both liminal times, and transforms these into his artists's books.

Marian Crawford considered the Archaic Stillness  of the Book, which, to her, has an aura of tradition. I think I have heard Marian speak before at the ARLIS/ANZ conference in Melbourne 2012 - there was an exhibition opening, if I recall correctly. Marian uses a letterpress printer to create her artists' books. She quoted Gerhard Richter: 'now that we do not have priests and philosophers anymore, artists are the most important people in the world'. I'm not sure I'd go that far, but there was another quotation she used from Alberto Manguel from The Library at Night that I was more comfortable with (in that it sits more closely with my lived experience): 'the book itself is a site of new knowledge that lies not in the accumulation of texts or information, nor in the object itself, but in the experience rescued from the page and transformed again into experience, ... in the reader's own being'. This quotation tied in closely with her idea of bookmaking and reading being a cycle. She finished by commenting if only we could put all these [artists'] books into the hands of the world.

The morning session concluded with a paper from Angie Butler from the University of the West of England Bristol. Similar to the papers presented by book artists the day before, this felt to me like a meditation on the process. Her paper title took its inspiration from Betty Bright: ‘Such works of handwork and hybridity remember the body. Heavy on this planet and in this space and moment, the book in hand completing the circle from artist, to press to reader, and completing us in turn’. She described letterpress printing as working with the framework of slow principles: the process requires the printer to slow down and focus on the task in hand.

The afternoon consisted of the formal launch of the QCA Prints Archive and the formal opening of the Artists Books Brisbane Event (ABBE) 2020. I won't be writing a separate blog post on those. Ross Woodrow, in launching the archive, noted that the history of printmaking could be divided into two eras: the era of the matrix and the era of paper. Paper including parchment and papyrus goes back 2000 yrs, but the matrix - in the form of stone and metal seals - goes back 5000 yrs and these ancient seals can still print and convey their information to us now. He also noted that print is bound up with materiality which holds meaning. Noreen Grahame, in opening the ABBE, told the story of an academic's first encounter with artists' books, initially declaring they weren't books at all, but he kept returning to them and eventually conceded that artists' books 'have something going for them'. Which seems a good note to end this post on.

Friday 13 November 2020

ARLIS/ANZ 2020 Conference Day 2 Morning Session 1

The morning sessions kicked off with a pre-recorded keynote from Sarah Bodman from the University of the West of England. She showed us a number of the activities undertaken at the Book Arts Centre there, the collaboration between artists and libraries and even, to my delight, showed some artists' libraries I wasn't familiar with. These included Heide Neilson's Outernet Library Branch, the Bristol Art Library, and Cathey Webb's books of found poetry, extracted from library shelves, reminded me of Ash Tower's Postcards from the Bibliopolis, created from found objects from the shelves of the Barr Smith Library at the University of Adelaide. A similar theme was using post-it notes found left behind in library books to create cushion designs.

One activity in particular, an exhibition for World Book Night, showed artists respondings to books, short stories, and libraries. This year's theme - chosen before Covid-19 hit - was Should we have stayed at home and thought of here? This turned out to be a presicent choice. WBN2020 invited artists to contribute postcards on the theme - reminiscent of the Royal Academy's postcard fundraising exhibition (and Adelaide Central School of Art's Wish You Were here annual postcard fundraiser). Coordinator Linda Parr has also issued a call for participation in a Republic of Postcards, on the theme of Perec's Postcards, inspired by Georges Perec's postcard messages in 'Two Hundred and Forty-Three Postcards in Real Colour'.

Margaret Warren from the State Library of Queensland then spoke about the SLQ's digital strategy which aims to think, act and be digital. She showed several examples of this such as the Corley Explorer - an amazing collection of photographs taken of houses in Brisbane and other parts of Queensland - which one can explore and add information to. She also talked about how they chose to abandon the ubiquitous search box in favour of other methods of exploration for their digital copies of the The Queenslander magazine. Other projects included the development of a voice-activated Anzac Stories app, which was accelerated by Covid and was used 15,000 times in the lead up to Remembrance Day this year, and a voice-activated Baby Stories and Rhymes app which, she's been told, is apparently very popular with parents when driving. Overall, the success of their strategy is that it doesn't feel like a strategy anymore but simply business as usual (whilst not ignoring the physical, rather leveraging both together).

Steven Miller from the Art Gallery of New South Wales then talked about the AGNSW's response to Covid with the Together in Art website. All departments of the gallery were involved and they deliberately chose not to recycle existing content but to create new content (loved the isolation mullet post). They also supported artists who were badly hit by Covid by commissioning new works. The staffg at AGNSW has found the Together in Art website to be transformative and the director of the AGNSW, Michael Brand, described it as a circuit-breaker.

Simon Underschultz from the National Gallery of Australia described how they set up a Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. Early in my experience as Wikipedia editor, I attended an edit-a-thon that was organised in Adelaide to learn about Wikipedia editing and it was disastrous - I knew more about it than the person who was supposed to showing us, so I know first-hand that they are difficult to organise. The NGA's edit-a-thon was organised in conjunction with Art+Feminism, Wikimedia Australia and the Know My Name initiative at the NGA and was scheduled for International Women's Day. Crucial to the success of the edit-a-thon was the fact Simon organised and prepped materials for volunteers to use in their editing - a great idea.

Of course, the aim was to focus on notable Australian women artists and what constitutes notability is a hotly-debated topic amongts Wikipedia editors. It is vitally important to ensure that every statement in a Wikipedia article is supported by a citation drawn from secondary and tertiary sources. To capitalise on the energy created by the edit-a-thon and not have it dissipated by the lockdown, the NGA created an NGA Wiki club - this is a terrific idea and I'll be following up with Simon to join as I write articles on South Australian contemporary artists. The results from the Wiki club are impressive: 

  • 27 editors
  • 16 articles created
  • 128 articles edited
  • 1.4k edits
  • 57.8k words added
  • 722 references added

David Dellafiora and Susan Hartigan talked about the Field Report. The Field Report started off as a way for unemployed artists to fill in some of their time by creating and swapping artworks, notably in the form of artists' books. This has now become an annual publication. As an assembling publication, it is related to zines and to APAs - Amateur Press Associations (I called them Amateur Publishing Associations in my tweet). It is also related to mail art and postcard art.

As a follow-up to Megan Lott's paper that she presented at ARLIS/ANZ's 2018 conference, Tara Marhajan of Rutgers University Special Collections presented a paper on how they draw upon material in the archives and special collections to create materials that can be circulated and given away to students. Starting with a Rutgers University version of Monopoly held in the archives, they created a copy of the board game in a pizza box which students can borrow - and this inspired one of their professors to create an assignment getting students to make board games out of / in pizza boxes. They also make badges, zines, colouring books, and puzzles to give to students and, during lockdown, put some of this material online. It allows them to promote the archives and special collections to students and brings them into the library and archives. They create postcards as a welcome to students and encourage them to complete and address the postcards which the library will then stamp and post for them. This has proven very popular with students. As a fellow Arlisian put it, archive goals.

The morning session chair, Tim Moseley from QCA, noted, to his surprise and delight, a resonance between art librarians and book artists. Well, we are a natural fit.



Wednesday 11 November 2020

ARLIS/ANZ 2020 Conference Day 1 Afternoon

The theme of the afternoon session was Artists' Books: identity, memory and narrative. This session entailed three artists and one collaboration discussing how they develop and make their artists' books. Darren Bryant creates artists' books by screen-printing representations of half-tone dots on pages from children's encyclopedias, which he then folds geometrically to transform these old pages into non-linear narratives, raising questions of authenticity (he cited both Walter Benjamin on reproduction and critics of Benjamin ), nostalgia, and in particular, aura.

Annique Goldenberg (whose work Enforced Austerity is ARLSI/ANZ's conference logo for 2020) talked about the long process of transforming materials gathered from different places into artists' books. When it goes online, this will be one to add to your viewing list as it is difficult to encapsulate.

Ana Paula Estrada described how she processed the pain and memory of a breakup by transforming her husband's clothes into a book and then discussed how she has had to transform her current practice into digital artworks due to COVID-19. 

Grief was also the theme of Louis Lim and Beth Jackson's paper. Taking their own grief and expressing it through poetry, Polaroid processes, drawing upon separate cultures and creating books from these. This will be another to add to your viewing list.

The remainder of the afternoon has been given over to exhibition tours for onsite participants and a Zoom meeting for online participants.

ARLIS/ANZ 2020 Conference Day 1 Morning

 The theme of this year's conference is reimagining the material: artists books, printed matter, digital transformation, engagement. The Queensland chapter has managed, despite Covid-19, to put together a conference with both onsite and online options - I opted to attend online. Despite a hiccup in the livestream during the keynote (and a mixup in slide), this so far seems to be going well. It's definitely easier for me to tweet during the conference, though not as easy to add images to my tweets.

The opening keynote was delivered by Fiona Foley, a Badjtala artist and academic, from K'gari (Fraser Island to us white folks). It was fascinating. Foley's family has a long tradition of writing and publishing with her uncle, Wilf Reeves, publishing the first Indigenous children's book in 1964 - The Legends of Moonie Jarl. Foley showed us some of the pages and the illustrations are incredibly beautiful. Her mother, Shirley Foley, spent twenty years putting together a Badtjala-English word list. Badtjala can be considered an endangered language as only older people now speak some of the words. Foley herself has written several books (her latest book is Biting the Clouds - see image below) and she has undertaken considerable historical research to uncover the history of the Badtjala people but also other Aboriginal nations in Queensland. This research is also critical to her art practice.

Her keynote was titled Lifting the Veil on Aboriginal Knowledges, and she lamented the absence of not only of critical race studies in our universities but also the almost complete absence of anything to do with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in our education system. As she said, ignorance is no longer an excuse and it should not be up to our Indigenous to teach and embed this history in our curricula. In her paper, she mentioned several important historical works that influenced her and I'm looking forward to getting these references.

As an aside, she gave a shout-out to the effort to save the printmaking studio at Queensland College of the Arts, which is under threat of closure.


The first session after morning tea was themed Reimagined Collections and Archives and featured papers from Eric Riddler of the Art Gallery of New South Wales on the digitisation of a major slide collection and its uses, Keri Klumpp of the University of Queensland on the digitisation of the Daphne Mayo Archive and how it was being used in research, Jacklyn Young from QAGOMA on the Peter Tyndall/Robert MacPherson Correspondence Archive and its use in exhibitions, Tim Mosely from the Queensland College of the Arts and his explorations of the haptic in his art practice and whether it would translate into a digital collection, and Russell Craig and Therese Nolan-Brown on the development ot the Queensland College of the Arts Print Archive.  

The variety of materials and uses explored in these papers was fascinating, covering digital and material, sight and touch, art techniques and research methods. Unfortunately, due to technical issues, I missed the first part of Eric's paper and will have to watch it in full after the conference when it's made available online. 

The second session was devoted to artists' residencies in libraries and covered the Printer-in-Residence program at the University of Sydney Library, using an antique Albion letterpress printer, Clyde McGill's meditations on material space, including looking, listening, and walking, and Seth Ellis's work in identifying hidden historical sounds in the State Library of Queensland's collections and finding ways to describe it so that it can be found by users.

Each residency was very different from the other, with very different outputs. Although the first two did produce artists' books, the Printer-in-Residence program also produced posters and McGill produced a kind of visual authority by overprinting old cataluge authority cards with images.

The morning sessions covered a wide range of topics: memory, history, touch, sound, materiality, space, production, different ways of marking our presence in this world and saying something about it. It was a very good start to the conference.


Tuesday 2 July 2019

Conceptualising research

As an art librarian who is also a doctoral student (and today, suffering a serious case of procrastinitis triggered by my feelings re an examiner's comments and trying to work through them), I have been thinking about the mental models I apply to my research. These mental models are not the usual ontological models that are normally discussed in research, nor are they the theoretical frameworks that one can apply to one's research. Rather, they are meta models that apply to the process of embarking upon, undertaking, completing and publishing research. They are ways of thinking about the issues that arise during research and, for me, ways of minimising a lot of the angst and stress that seems to be part-and-parcel of research. Three mental models I have three mental models that I use to conceptualise research and I have been conscious of one of them right from the start of my doctoral research. I realised very recently that there is another that I have been using mostly subconsciously throughout. The third I have only developed recently. For convenience, I have named these models, Walking the Pattern, Threading the Maze, and Rafting the River.

Walking the Pattern

Labyrinth at St Mary's, Parnell Rd, Auckland
In Roger Zelazny's Amber novels, the princes and princesses of Amber gain their ability to move between worlds by walking a labyrinth deep below the castle. Only a descendent of Oberon can walk the pattern and even then, it is dangerous. Once started, it must be completed and the walker must never pause in her walk. The labyrinth represents the deep structure of the Amber universe and walking the pattern confers upon the walker the ability to manipulate this deep structure. However, the power encoded in the labyrinth will resist and push back against the walker. This is why the walker cannot pause: if she does, the power in the pattern will kill her. at times, the walker will feel like she is stalled, but she must keep pushing and eventually she will begin to move again and finally complete the pattern.

I first used the idea of Walking the Pattern in an essay in 1994 to describe how a scientist's cognitive history shapes their approach to their research. Throughout my own research, I have consciously used the idea of persistence (keep pushing) whenever I have felt that I was never going to finish. On days when I only read one journal article or one book chapter or only wrote 100 words or only analysed one webpage, that that was one journal article, book chapter, webpage or 100 words more towards the end line - that I had kept on pushing and so, would eventually reach the end. It's only recently that I realised where this idea of keep on pushing came from - this deeply embedded idea of Walking the Pattern. It's not a new idea - many others will tell you that persistence is a key ingredient in research, but for me, my understanding of persistence comes from Zelazny and Amber and Walking the Pattern.


Threading the Maze 

Longleat maze by Niki Odolphie from Frome, England [CC BY 2.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)]


















The next mental model that I have used throughout my research is that of making my way through a maze and, yes, I know I have just been talking about walking a labyrinth but there is a connotative difference between a labyrinth and a maze. Some labyrinths consist of a single path without any dead ends and are intended as spiritual and meditative journeys. The labyrinth in the cathedral of Chartres is such a labyrinth. In contrast, a maze has many dead ends. Researching a topic will result in a lot of dead ends and wrong turns but you know something, you have to hit those dead ends and wrong turns so you know not only that they are dead ends and wrong turns but also why they are dead ends and wrong turns.

Having this model in mind has helped whenever I have hit dead ends and wrong turns - understanding that this is part of the process has ensured that I haven't thrown up my hands and thought it was a disaster. Another aspect of this model is the idea of a thread that will help you keep track of your journey through the maze, like Theseus in the Minotaur's labyrinth using Ariadne's thread to way his way back. For most researchers, this will be the research journal and here I have to confess, I have not been particularly good about keeping a research journal. My notes and thoughts tend to be scattered across various notebooks and files. But they're still there. Indeed, I'm able to refer to them to answer some of the examiners' comments.

When I attended the induction for PhD students at my university, a professor got up and described research as a quest, like the quest for the one ring in The Lord of the Rings (his description, not mine). Our quest was for the knowledge that we would discover through our research. I'm uncomfortable with this metaphor for research as we don't always know what we are going to discover. We may have an idea of it which can turn out to be completely wrong.

Now, it's important ot note that are some aspects of the quest that do apply, particularly if you are familiar with Joseph Campbell's structure of the monomyth from The Hero with a Thousand Faces. The most important concept for me is the idea that one is master of two worlds and able - indeed, required - to share that knowledge with others.

Rafting the River

Grand Canyon from space (NASA [Public domain])
This is the most recent mental model I have developed, primarily to help me with examiners' comments. I also think it will help me with reviewers' comments when submitting journal and conference papers. It applies when you send your research out into the world, but it can also apply to dealing with feedback from your supervisors. In this model, I have gotten into a raft and launched it onto a river in a canyon system. As I travel the river, I am going to receive guidance from supervisors, examiners and reviewers who are on top of the cliffs and so have a better view of the system than I do. Some stretches of the river will be calm and easy to navigate and some stretches will be white-water rapids with turbulent currents and hidden rocks. Also, there isn't just one river in this system but many rivers, so it's easy to get lost.

When I launched my raft, I could initially see where I was going: the goal (results) of my research. I've fixed my route in my mind as I know once I'm on the water, I won't be able to see a clear route to my goal. This is where supervisors, examiners and reviewers come in. They're standing on top of the cliffs and they're shouting out comments and instructions to me from those cliffs. What I have to decide is this: are they focused on the same goal as me or a different goal? Also, is their view of the system similar to mine or different? The canyon system is a metaphor for the landscape of knowledge and each of us has only a partial view of that terrain. Sometimes my supervisors and examiners and reviewers will be able to alert to problems that I hadn't seen and help me to either avoid or, if I hit them, how to get out of them. As I make my way along the river, I need to understand how those partial views fit together so that I can realise when those partial views are helping me or leading me astray or when my own partial view has led me astray.

When I received my examiners' marks and comments back, I had one set of good marks and comments and one set of bad marks and comments. But in talking it through with my supervisor, we realised that the comments from the second examiner were coming from her understanding and knowledge of the research topic - her view of the canyon system. It wasn't so much that I had done a bad job of the research but rather that she wanted to see more of it and, especially, more of how it connects to other parts of the system. In addressing those comments, I want to ensure that I don't end up going down a different river whilst showing my bit of the river connects to the bit that she can see.

So those are the three mental models (or, if you prefer, metaphors) that I have to used conceptualise the process of research. I found them a great help and I hope you do too.

Wednesday 10 October 2018

ARLIS/ANZ 2018 Conference Day 2 afternoon

During lunch (where I was pleasantly surprised by the presence of sandwiches that didn't have cheese and tomato in them - two ingredients I have to avoid and which are very difficult to avoid), I visited the bookshop and James Turrell's Skyspace.
After lunch, some delegates went to the AGM and others toured some of the exhibitions. As a chapter president, I went to the AGM. The afternoon session resumed with Peta Jane Blessing. Tim Jones was next discussing audio aids for collection viewing. Duncan McColl of AIATSIS introduced us to their art collections and their beta online platforms. You'll notice a lot of typos in these tweets - getting towards the end of conference and I was getting tired. Duncan was the last speaker for the day (not a great spot, but he did a great job). Although these tweets give only a brief flavour of the papers (some briefer than others), all of the papers will go online at the ARLIS/ANZ website, along with the slides and audio recordings of the presentations. As for the delegates, some left that evening and some the next day. I was one of the ones who left the next day.

ARLIS/ANZ 2018 Conference Day 2 morning

Day 2 of the conference took place at the National Gallery of Australia, as Simon Underschultz noted below: I think everyone needed a coffee/tea to get started - in the foreground of the picture above, you can see Jin Whittington of the Art Gallery of South Australia talking to Alan Yu of M Plus Contemporary (Hong Kong), and the lady with her back to the photo is Megan Lotts of Rutgers University Libraries - a truly international group of librarians. Katie was followed by Helen Ennis, who gave keynote address on artists' personal archives and unofficial documents. Following morning tea, Caroline McBride of the Auckland Art Gallery Toi o Tāmaki discussed art archives. In the afternoon session, Tim Jones of Christchurch Art Gallery Te Puna o Waiwhetū also spoke and I loved that they both commenced with traditional greetings in te reo Māori. Personally, I love it and feel that Australia could learn from New Zealand and how they have embraced indigenous culture. Although we acknowledge the traditional owners of the land and include an indigenous elder welcoming everyone to country, I feel we could - and should - be doing much more to incorporate indigenous culture, knowledge and understanding into everyday activities. It might help us to close the gap faster and more effectively if we did. Simon Underschultz was up next, showing off some of the highlights of the NGA's collection. Anne followed this tweet with one correcting the spelling of Morten's surname. Eric Riddler was next, except that he metamorphosed into Stephen Miller because he had lost his voice. And then it was my turn too mispell someone's name. And on the high note of Eric's presentation, we broke for lunch.